A problem in mathematics is given to 3 students whose chances of solving individually are ½ , ⅓ and ¼. The probability that the problem will be solved at least by one, is what?
The best way to solve this is to first find the probability of them not been able to solve the question individually, then from that find the probability of them not been able to solve the question collectively. From there, you can then find the probability of one of them solving it (which will be 1 - probability of them not solving it).
Probability of them not been able to solve the question individually will be (1 - ½ ), (1 - ⅓) and (1 - ¼) Which are: ½, ⅔ and ¾
Probability of them not been able to solve the question collectively will then be: ½ x ⅔ x ¾ = ⁶⁄₂₄ ⁶⁄₂₄ can be reduced to ¼
The probability of then solving the question collectively will then be 1 - ¼ = ¾
A problem in mathematics is given to 3 students whose chances of solving individually are ½ , ⅓ and ¼. The probability that the problem will be solved at least by one, is what?
The best way to solve this is to first find the probability of them not been able to solve the question individually, then from that find the probability of them not been able to solve the question collectively. From there, you can then find the probability of one of them solving it (which will be 1 - probability of them not solving it).
Probability of them not been able to solve the question individually will be (1 - ½ ), (1 - ⅓) and (1 - ¼) Which are: ½, ⅔ and ¾
Probability of them not been able to solve the question collectively will then be: ½ x ⅔ x ¾ = ⁶⁄₂₄ ⁶⁄₂₄ can be reduced to ¼
The probability of then solving the question collectively will then be 1 - ¼ = ¾
Answer: ¾
BY Riddles Repository - Answers
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/tg-me/post.php on line 283
That growth environment will include rising inflation and interest rates. Those upward shifts naturally accompany healthy growth periods as the demand for resources, products and services rise. Importantly, the Federal Reserve has laid out the rationale for not interfering with that natural growth transition.It's not exactly a fad, but there is a widespread willingness to pay up for a growth story. Classic fundamental analysis takes a back seat. Even negative earnings are ignored. In fact, positive earnings seem to be a limiting measure, producing the question, "Is that all you've got?" The preference is a vision of untold riches when the exciting story plays out as expected.
The S&P 500 slumped 1.8% on Monday and Tuesday, thanks to China Evergrande, the Chinese property company that looks like it is ready to default on its more-than $300 billion in debt. Cries of the next Lehman Brothers—or maybe the next Silverado?—echoed through the canyons of Wall Street as investors prepared for the worst.
